linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] thermal: intel: int340x: Use generic trip points table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10ad845597c47b8b7d1ba1aa9fe93825d249f56e.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:02:59 -0800
From:   srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] thermal: intel: int340x: Use generic trip points
 table

Hi Rafael,


On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 16:20 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Srinivas,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:55 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > This series replaces the following patch:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/2147918.irdbgypaU6@kreacher/
> > 
> > but it has been almost completely rewritten, so I've dropped all
> > tags from it.
> > 
> > 

[...]

> > The series is on top of this patch:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/2688799.mvXUDI8C0e@kreacher/
> > 
> > which applies on top of the linux-next branch in linux-pm.git from
> > today.
> 
> There are two additional branches in linux-pm.git:
> 
> thermal-intel-fixes
On two systems test, no issues are observed.

> thermal-intel-testing
branch: thermal-intel-test

No issues, but number of trips are not same as invalid trips are not
registered.
Not sure if this is correct. At boot up they may be invalid, but
firmware may update later (Not aware of such scenario).

For example, the hot is not registered.

Current:

thermal_zone9/trip_point_0_type:critical
thermal_zone9/trip_point_0_temp:125050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_0_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_1_type:hot
thermal_zone9/trip_point_1_temp:-273250
thermal_zone9/trip_point_1_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_2_type:passive
thermal_zone9/trip_point_2_temp:103050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_2_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_3_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_3_temp:103050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_3_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_4_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_4_temp:101050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_4_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_5_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_5_temp:100050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_5_hyst:0


thermal_zone9/trip_point_6_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_6_temp:98550
thermal_zone9/trip_point_6_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_7_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_7_temp:97050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_7_hyst:0


with 6.3-rc1 changes

thermal_zone9/trip_point_0_type:critical
thermal_zone9/trip_point_0_temp:125050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_0_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_1_type:passive
thermal_zone9/trip_point_1_temp:103050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_1_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_2_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_2_temp:103050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_2_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_3_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_3_temp:101050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_3_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_4_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_4_temp:100050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_4_hyst:0

thermal_zone9/trip_point_5_type:active
thermal_zone9/trip_point_5_temp:98550
thermal_zone9/trip_point_5_hyst:0


thermal_zone9/trip_point_6_hyst:0
thermal_zone9/trip_point_6_temp:97050
thermal_zone9/trip_point_6_type:active

Thanks,
Srinivas


> 
> The former is just fixes to go on top of 6.2-rc5 and the latter -
> this
> series on top of those and the current thermal-intel branch I have
> locally with the Intel thermal drivers changes for 6.3.
> 
> I would appreciate giving each of them a go in your test setup.
> 
> Cheers!