[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9HmCY5zEiD/yCPi@debian.me>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 09:31:37 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Stefan Roesch <shr@...kernel.io>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v1 10/20] docs: document general_profit sysfs
knob
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:21:51AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
>
> > Seems like the wording is confusing me, so I write the improv:
> >
> > ---- >8 ----
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm
> > index 7768e90f7a8fef..5309a912ab679b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm
> > @@ -56,6 +56,6 @@ What: /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/general_profit
> > Date: January 2023
> > KernelVersion: 6.1
> > Contact: Linux memory management mailing list <linux-mm@...ck.org>
> > -Description: Measure how effective KSM is.
> > - general_profit: how effective is KSM. The formula for the
> > - calculation is in Documentation/admin-guide/mm/ksm.rst.
> > +Description: Measure the KSM profit. See
> > + :ref:`KSM documentation <monitoring-ksm-profit>` for details
> > + on the calculated formula.
>
> So the original at least attempted to tell us what "KSM profit" is; the
> "improved" version makes no such effort. I don't think that is actually
> better.
I overlooked that, thanks!
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists