linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: qcom: Add GPU clock controller driver for SM6125

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230126181935.mg7eida2e5vp42hc@builder.lan>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:19:35 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: qcom: Add GPU clock controller driver for SM6125

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 03:40:29PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sm6125.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sm6125.c
[..]
> +static int gpu_cc_sm6125_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	unsigned int value, mask;
> +
> +	regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &gpu_cc_sm6125_desc);
> +	if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> +
> +	clk_alpha_pll_configure(&gpu_cc_pll0_out_aux2, regmap, &gpu_pll0_config);
> +	clk_alpha_pll_configure(&gpu_cc_pll1_out_aux2, regmap, &gpu_pll1_config);
> +
> +	/* Recommended WAKEUP/SLEEP settings for the gpu_cc_cx_gmu_clk */
> +	mask = CX_GMU_CBCR_WAKE_MASK << CX_GMU_CBCR_WAKE_SHIFT;
> +	mask |= CX_GMU_CBCR_SLEEP_MASK << CX_GMU_CBCR_SLEEP_SHIFT;
> +	value = 0xf << CX_GMU_CBCR_WAKE_SHIFT | 0xf << CX_GMU_CBCR_SLEEP_SHIFT;

Perhaps I'm missing something here, but isn't mask == value after this?

Feels like this could be written cleaner using FIELD_PREP(), or perhaps
even moved to a helper function, so that we don't need to open code this
if it's needed in other places?

> +	regmap_update_bits(regmap, gpu_cc_cx_gmu_clk.clkr.enable_reg, mask, value);
> +
> +	/* Set up PERIPH/MEM retain on the GPU core clock */
> +	regmap_update_bits(regmap, gpu_cc_gx_gfx3d_clk.halt_reg,
> +			   (BIT(14) | BIT(13)), (BIT(14) | BIT(13)));

You don't need the extra parenthesis here.

> +
> +	return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &gpu_cc_sm6125_desc, regmap);
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver gpu_cc_sm6125_driver = {
> +	.probe = gpu_cc_sm6125_probe,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "gpucc-sm6125",
> +		.of_match_table = gpu_cc_sm6125_match_table,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static int __init gpu_cc_sm6125_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&gpu_cc_sm6125_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(gpu_cc_sm6125_init);

You don't need GPU at subsys, module_platform_driver() should be
sufficient (and =m in defconfig).

Thanks,
Bjorn