[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9LLehs4PSvHE6qf@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 20:50:34 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: llcc: Fix slice configuration values for
SC8280XP
On 23-01-26 18:25:52, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 26.01.2023 18:16, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > The new values have been taken from downstream kernel.
> >
> > Fixes: ec69dfbdc426 ("soc: qcom: llcc: Add sc8180x and sc8280xp configurations")
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> > index 23ce2f78c4ed..5702354fb946 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> > @@ -183,17 +183,17 @@ static const struct llcc_slice_config sc8280xp_data[] = {
> > { LLCC_AUDIO, 6, 1024, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 },
> > { LLCC_CMPT, 10, 6144, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 },
> > { LLCC_GPUHTW, 11, 1024, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > - { LLCC_GPU, 12, 4096, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1 },
> > + { LLCC_GPU, 12, 4608, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1 },
> priority (the arg right after 4608) should be 0 per downstream
Actually according to Sai's review [1], I need to revert this part.
>
>
> > { LLCC_MMUHWT, 13, 1024, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0 },
> > { LLCC_DISP, 16, 6144, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > { LLCC_AUDHW, 22, 2048, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > { LLCC_DRE, 26, 1024, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > { LLCC_CVP, 28, 512, 3, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > { LLCC_APTCM, 30, 1024, 3, 1, 0x0, 0x1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > - { LLCC_WRCACHE, 31, 1024, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0 },
> > - { LLCC_CVPFW, 32, 512, 1, 0, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > - { LLCC_CPUSS1, 33, 2048, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > - { LLCC_CPUHWT, 36, 512, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0 },
> > + { LLCC_WRCACHE, 31, 512, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0 },
Same goes for this line above.
> > + { LLCC_CVPFW, 17, 512, 1, 0, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > + { LLCC_CPUSS1, 3, 2048, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
> > + { LLCC_CPUHWT, 5, 512, 1, 1, 0xfff, 0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0 },
As for these 3 slice_ids, I need to doable check.
> CMPT1 (id 34) is still missing.
And Sai also says that CAMEXP0 (the upstream name of CMPT1) needs to be
dropped.
>
> With that:
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>
> Konrad
> > };
> >
> > static const struct llcc_slice_config sdm845_data[] = {
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8a627cc0-8f9b-0bda-c9b5-6d51a788948a@quicinc.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists