linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] docs/mm: Physical Memory: add structure, introduction and nodes description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9LWIQtPQ5yLIwu9@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:36:01 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] docs/mm: Physical Memory: add structure,
 introduction and nodes description

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:19:16AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > Add structure, introduction and Nodes section to Physical Memory
> > chapter.
> >
> > As the new documentation references core-api/dma-api and mm/page_reclaim,
> > add page labels to those documents.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@...nel.org>
> 
> I've gone ahead and applied this, but I do have one little gripe...
> 
> Something like:
> 
> > +Reclaim control
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +
> > +See also :ref:`Page Reclaim <page_reclaim>`.
> 
> Can also just be "See also Documentation/mm/page_reclaim.rst".  The
> right things will happen in the HTML output, readers of the plain-text
> will know immediately where to go, and we don't have to add the label
> clutter.
> 
> </gripe> :)

Do you want v6? ;-)
 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.