[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9LdwVX9BaZA7zmA@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 03:08:33 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
x86 Mailing List <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kselftest Mailing List
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Handle syscall in
a FRED system
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:40:23PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> So as per Andrew's comment, add:
>
> register void * rsp asm("%rsp");
>
> ...
>
> "+r" (rsp) /* clobber the redzone */
>
> ... as the right way to avoid redzone problems.
I played with this more. I found something wrong with this. This doesn't
work for me. The compiler still uses red zone despite I use "+r" (rsp).
What did I do wrong?
-----
ammarfaizi2@...egral2:/tmp$ gcc -fno-stack-protector -O2 -Wall -Wextra test.c -o test
ammarfaizi2@...egral2:/tmp$ objdump --no-show-raw-insn -d test | grep "a_leaf_func_with_red_zone>:" -A8
0000000000001180 <a_leaf_func_with_red_zone>:
1180: endbr64
1184: mov $0x1,%eax
1189: mov %rax,-0x8(%rsp) ## BUG!!!
118e: pushf
118f: pop %rax
1190: mov -0x8(%rsp),%rax ## BUG!!!
1195: ret
ammarfaizi2@...egral2:/tmp$ clang -O2 -Wall -Wextra test.c -o test
ammarfaizi2@...egral2:/tmp$ objdump --no-show-raw-insn -d test | grep "a_leaf_func_with_red_zone>:" -A6
0000000000001140 <a_leaf_func_with_red_zone>:
1140: mov $0x1,%eax
1145: mov %rax,-0x8(%rsp) ## BUG!!!
114a: pushf
114b: pop %rax
114c: mov -0x8(%rsp),%rax ## BUG!!!
1151: ret
-----
ammarfaizi2@...egral2:~$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
ammarfaizi2@...egral2:~$ clang --version
Ubuntu clang version 16.0.0 (++20230124031324+d63e492562f2-1~exp1~20230124151444.705)
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
-----
test.c:
#include <stdio.h>
static inline void clobber_redzone(void)
{
register void *rsp __asm__("%rsp");
unsigned long rflags;
__asm__ volatile ("pushf; popq %1"
: "+r" (rsp), "=r" (rflags));
}
static inline void set_red_zone(long *mem, long val)
{
__asm__ volatile ("movq %[val], %[mem]"
: [mem] "=m" (*mem)
: [val] "r" (val));
}
static inline long get_red_zone(long *mem)
{
long ret;
__asm__ volatile ("movq %[in], %[out]"
: [out] "=r" (ret)
: [in] "m" (*mem));
return ret;
}
__attribute__((__noinline__))
long a_leaf_func_with_red_zone(void)
{
long x;
set_red_zone(&x, 1);
clobber_redzone();
/* The correct retval is 1 */
return get_red_zone(&x);
}
int main(void)
{
printf("ret = %ld\n", a_leaf_func_with_red_zone());
return 0;
}
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists