[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9L291ySSSRHD3uB@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:56:07 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/highmem: Align-down to page the address for
kunmap_flush_on_unmap()
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:04:02PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:48:03PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:38:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:33:46 +0100 "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined (PA-RISC case), __kunmap_local()
> > > > calls kunmap_flush_on_unmap(). The latter currently flushes the wrong
> > > > address (as confirmed by Matthew Wilcox and Helge Deller). Al Viro
> > > > proposed to call kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page
> > > > address in order to fix this issue. Consensus has been reached on this
> > > > solution.
> > >
> > > What are the user-visible runtime effects of this flaw?
> >
> > The version of this patch I sent out includes this information,
> > as well as the missed alignment for kunmap_atomic().
>
> One point: AFAICS, the situation right now is
> * all callers of kunmap_local() pass page-aligned pointers
Ah, no. kmap_local_folio() accepts a byte offset within the folio
and returns a pointer to that byte. I hadn't noticed the parisc
case and thought it was already allowed to pass a misaligned pointer
to kunmap_local() since it is allowed for the highmem case. It
simplified the callers, so it looked like a good tradeoff.
See, eg 338f379cf7c2:
- src_addr = kmap_atomic(src_page);
- dest_addr = kmap_atomic(dest_page);
+ src_addr = kmap_local_folio(src_folio,
+ offset_in_folio(src_folio, srcoff));
+ dst_addr = kmap_local_folio(dst_folio,
+ offset_in_folio(dst_folio, dstoff));
- if (memcmp(src_addr + src_poff, dest_addr + dest_poff, cmp_len))
+ if (memcmp(src_addr, dst_addr, cmp_len))
- kunmap_atomic(dest_addr);
- kunmap_atomic(src_addr);
+ kunmap_local(dst_addr);
+ kunmap_local(src_addr);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists