linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: scmi: Allow for zero voltage domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9L4nplArbRMP9DK@pluto>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:03:10 +0000
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: scmi: Allow for zero voltage domains

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:38:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:05:11PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > SCMI Voltage protocol allows the platform to report no voltage domains
> > on discovery, while warning the user about such an odd configuration.
> 
> This patch removes all diagnostics in this case?

You'll still see a warning from the SCMI core Voltage Protocol saying:

	"No Voltage domains found."

but nothing from the regulator driver itself which will successfully probe,
albeit not creating any regulators...if this is what you mean.

Thanks for having a look,
Cristian