linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [v2] ASoC: cs42l56: fix DT probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:55:57 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        James Schulman <james.schulman@...rus.com>,
        David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
        Lucas Tanure <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Zheyu Ma <zheyuma97@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] ASoC: cs42l56: fix DT probe

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:21:24 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> While looking through legacy platform data users, I noticed that
> the DT probing never uses data from the DT properties, as the
> platform_data structure gets overwritten directly after it
> is initialized.
> 
> There have never been any boards defining the platform_data in
> the mainline kernel either, so this driver so far only worked
> with patched kernels or with the default values.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cs42l56: fix DT probe
      commit: e18c6da62edc780e4f4f3c9ce07bdacd69505182

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark