linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 09:56:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:08:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> This one makes sense for 5.10, but we don't have followup patches in
> 4.19, so we don't need this:
> 
> > Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
> >     xhci: Add a flag to disable USB3 lpm on a xhci root port level.

Probably, care to send a revert?

> Plus, we have patch in 5.10 which we probably need in 4.19/4.14:
> 
> |0c7428f0d 8ccc99 o: 5.10| net/ulp: use consistent error code when  blocking ULP

I do not know what this means, please provide a working sha1 and submit
it for inclusion normally.

thanks,

greg k-h