linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: codecs: constify static sdw_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <167469293316.2696228.10033245530806500019.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 00:28:53 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: codecs: constify static sdw_slave_ops struct

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:39:51 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The struct sdw_slave_ops is not modified and sdw_driver takes pointer to
> const, so make it a const for code safety.
> 
> 

Applied to

   broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] ASoC: codecs: constify static sdw_slave_ops struct
      commit: 65b7b869da9bd3bd0b9fa60e6fe557bfbc0a75e8
[2/3] ASoC: codecs: constify static sdw_port_config struct
      commit: 57dc05c4e6faaab5d8e7fb631f285120d7ed4b07
[3/3] ASoC: codecs: wsa88xx: remove unneeded includes
      commit: 27681129b089d9a5d597a05f6e1821eb6d82919b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark