[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <febd59ed-ff7b-ffc4-5568-d856703c9123@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:31:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64
On 25/01/2023 21:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2023-01-23 01:49:25)
>> There is no point to allow selecting pin-controller drivers for Qualcomm
>
> pin controllers?
Copy-paste, I'll fix it.
>
>> ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa. This makes
>> kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the Qualcomm
>> SoCs model names/numbers. There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and
>> ARMv8/9 SoCs, so no features/options are lost.
>
> Are the drivers used in arm32 emulation mode on these SoCs? I recall
> there are some SoCs they run with the arm architecture.
I did not add it to the few SoCs which have upstream DTS in ARM and
ARM64. I added only to the ones which are in one specific folder. Also
my patch does not affect defconfigs (qcom_defconfig and arm64/defconfig).
Whether downstream could be affected, I do not know. Anyway, what's
downstream it's the downstream's problem...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists