| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230126105128.2249938-1-dvyukov@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:51:28 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread
Prefer to deliver signals to the current thread if SIGEV_THREAD_ID
is not set. We used to prefer the main thread, but delivering
to the current thread is both faster, and allows to sample actual thread
activity for CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID timers, and does not change
the semantics (since we queue into shared_pending, all thread may
receive the signal in both cases).
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- switched to the completely different implementation (much simpler)
based on the Oleg's idea
Changes in RFC v2:
- added additional Cc as Thomas asked
---
kernel/signal.c | 19 ++++-
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index ae26da61c4d9f..6ed71701f302c 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1003,8 +1003,7 @@ static void complete_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, enum pid_type type)
/*
* Now find a thread we can wake up to take the signal off the queue.
*
- * If the main thread wants the signal, it gets first crack.
- * Probably the least surprising to the average bear.
+ * Try the suggested task first (may or may not be the main thread).
*/
if (wants_signal(sig, p))
t = p;
@@ -1970,7 +1969,23 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct pid *pid, enum pid_type type)
ret = -1;
rcu_read_lock();
+ /*
+ * This is called from posix timers. SIGEV_THREAD_ID signals
+ * (type == PIDTYPE_PID) must be delivered to the user-specified
+ * thread, so we use that and queue into t->pending.
+ * Non-SIGEV_THREAD_ID signals must be delivered to "the process",
+ * so we queue into shared_pending, but prefer to deliver to the
+ * current thread. We used to prefer the main thread, but delivering
+ * to the current thread is both faster, and allows user-space to
+ * sample actual thread activity for CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID timers,
+ * and does not change the semantics (since we queue into
+ * shared_pending, all thread may receive the signal in both cases).
+ * Note: current may be from a completely unrelated process for
+ * non-cpu-time-based timers, we must be careful to not kick it.
+ */
t = pid_task(pid, type);
+ if (t && type != PIDTYPE_PID && same_thread_group(t, current))
+ t = current;
if (!t || !likely(lock_task_sighand(t, &flags)))
goto ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c
index 0ba500056e635..fd3b933a191fe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c
@@ -188,6 +188,76 @@ static int check_timer_create(int which)
return 0;
}
+int remain;
+__thread int got_signal;
+
+static void *distribution_thr(void *arg) {
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&remain, __ATOMIC_RELAXED));
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void distribution_handler(int nr)
+{
+ if (!__atomic_exchange_n(&got_signal, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED))
+ __atomic_fetch_sub(&remain, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+}
+
+/* Test that all running threads receive CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID signals. */
+static int check_timer_distribution(void)
+{
+ int err, i;
+ timer_t id;
+ const int nthreads = 10;
+ pthread_t threads[nthreads];
+ struct itimerspec val = {
+ .it_value.tv_sec = 0,
+ .it_value.tv_nsec = 1000 * 1000,
+ .it_interval.tv_sec = 0,
+ .it_interval.tv_nsec = 1000 * 1000,
+ };
+
+ printf("Check timer_create() per process signal distribution... ");
+ fflush(stdout);
+
+ remain = nthreads + 1; /* worker threads + this thread */
+ signal(SIGALRM, distribution_handler);
+ err = timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ perror("Can't create timer\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ err = timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ perror("Can't set timer\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) {
+ if (pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, distribution_thr, NULL)) {
+ perror("Can't create thread\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Wait for all threads to receive the signal. */
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&remain, __ATOMIC_RELAXED));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) {
+ if (pthread_join(threads[i], NULL)) {
+ perror("Can't join thread\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (timer_delete(id)) {
+ perror("Can't delete timer\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ printf("[OK]\n");
+ return 0;
+}
+
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
printf("Testing posix timers. False negative may happen on CPU execution \n");
@@ -217,5 +287,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if (check_timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID) < 0)
return ksft_exit_fail();
+ if (check_timer_distribution() < 0)
+ return ksft_exit_fail();
+
return ksft_exit_pass();
}
base-commit: 7c46948a6e9cf47ed03b0d489fde894ad46f1437
--
2.39.1.456.gfc5497dd1b-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists