[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ+uVV3y83bPH9bC_6_umsHEXUMwBYY_zw1H8ABQKpnYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 13:39:59 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] gpiolib: get rid of exessive ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback()
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:53 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> The ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback() repeats the idea that lies behind
> ->add_pin_ranges(), while the latter covers more cases that the former
> hook. Drop the former one for good.
>
> Changelog v3:
> - moved check of the property presense to GPIO library
> - split out the refcount fix in a separate patch
> - added cover letter
Patches applied! Sorry for taking almost 2 weeks :/
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists