[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9J1+fEErNzaN0fq@orome>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 13:45:45 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: tegra186: remove unneeded loop in
tegra186_gpio_init_route_mapping()
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:26:31PM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> Reviewing the j loop over num_irqs_per_bank, in the code previous
> to the fixes: commit, every j was used. now only when j == 0.
> If only j == 0 is used, there is no need for the loop.
>
> Fixes: 210386804745 ("gpio: tegra186: Support multiple interrupts per bank")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
> index 9941f35af823..14c872b6ad05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id tegra186_pmc_of_match[] = {
> static void tegra186_gpio_init_route_mapping(struct tegra_gpio *gpio)
> {
> struct device *dev = gpio->gpio.parent;
> - unsigned int i, j;
> + unsigned int i;
> u32 value;
>
> for (i = 0; i < gpio->soc->num_ports; i++) {
> @@ -699,27 +699,23 @@ static void tegra186_gpio_init_route_mapping(struct tegra_gpio *gpio)
> * On Tegra194 and later, each pin can be routed to one or more
> * interrupts.
> */
> - for (j = 0; j < gpio->num_irqs_per_bank; j++) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "programming default interrupt routing for port %s\n",
> - port->name);
> -
> - offset = TEGRA186_GPIO_INT_ROUTE_MAPPING(p, j);
> -
> - /*
> - * By default we only want to route GPIO pins to IRQ 0. This works
> - * only under the assumption that we're running as the host kernel
> - * and hence all GPIO pins are owned by Linux.
> - *
> - * For cases where Linux is the guest OS, the hypervisor will have
> - * to configure the interrupt routing and pass only the valid
> - * interrupts via device tree.
> - */
> - if (j == 0) {
> - value = readl(base + offset);
> - value = BIT(port->pins) - 1;
> - writel(value, base + offset);
> - }
> - }
> + dev_dbg(dev, "programming default interrupt routing for port %s\n",
> + port->name);
> +
> + offset = TEGRA186_GPIO_INT_ROUTE_MAPPING(p, 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * By default we only want to route GPIO pins to IRQ 0. This works
> + * only under the assumption that we're running as the host kernel
> + * and hence all GPIO pins are owned by Linux.
> + *
> + * For cases where Linux is the guest OS, the hypervisor will have
> + * to configure the interrupt routing and pass only the valid
> + * interrupts via device tree.
> + */
> + value = readl(base + offset);
> + value = BIT(port->pins) - 1;
> + writel(value, base + offset);
This was supposed to be a placeholder so that a more complex routing
could be added later on. Maybe adding "j" to the debug message would
have made that a bit clearer.
Anyway, no complex routing has been needed so far, so I don't have a
strong objection to this. We can always add it back if we ever need it.
On the other hand, we don't do much in the loop, so leaving it as-is
wouldn't be harmful either.
I'll leave it up to Linus and Bartosz to decide. If they want to pick it
up:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists