[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9KFENOgVGC2bUAj@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:08 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] gpiolib: remove gpio_set_debounce
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> gpio_set_debounce() only has a single user, which is trivially
> converted to gpiod_set_debounce().
Also need to mention the gpio_cansleep() removal.
P.S. Fun fact that I was yesterday thinking about the pretty much
the same change, except intrusive conversion of the user.
...
> Documentation/driver-api/gpio/legacy.rst | 2 --
Documentation/translations/zh_CN/driver-api/gpio/legacy.rst:222: gpio_set_debounce()
Documentation/translations/zh_TW/gpio.txt:229: gpio_set_debounce()
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/gpio.h | 22 ----------------------
...
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
Do we need this?
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
And this?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists