[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230126135258.zpvyfxc2ffhzzsnx@quack3>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:52:58 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Maxim Korotkov <korotkov.maxim.s@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: fix call of incorrect macro
On Thu 19-01-23 13:44:43, Maxim Korotkov wrote:
> the variable 'history' is of type u16, it may be an error
> that the hweight32 macro was used for it
> I guess macro hweight16 should be used
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 2a81490811d0 ("writeback: implement foreign cgroup inode detection")
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <korotkov.maxim.s@...il.com>
Looks good to me, although it is mostly a theoretical issue - I don't see
how hweight32 could do any harm here. Anyway, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 6fba5a52127b..fc16123b2405 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ void wbc_detach_inode(struct writeback_control *wbc)
> * is okay. The main goal is avoiding keeping an inode on
> * the wrong wb for an extended period of time.
> */
> - if (hweight32(history) > WB_FRN_HIST_THR_SLOTS)
> + if (hweight16(history) > WB_FRN_HIST_THR_SLOTS)
> inode_switch_wbs(inode, max_id);
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists