[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e14875ff-7d59-ae24-9fb0-8169c54c7a17@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 19:32:53 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michał Mirosław
<emmir@...gle.com>, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Danylo Mocherniuk <mdanylo@...gle.com>,
Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL to get and/or
the clear info about PTEs
On 1/24/23 10:30 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:18:13PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>> + if (IS_GET_OP(p) && p->max_pages && (p->found_pages == p->max_pages))
>>>> + return -ENOSPC;
>>>
>>> This is the function to test "whether the walker should walk the vma
>>> specified". This check should IIUC be meaningless because found_pages
>>> doesn't boost during vma switching, while OTOH your pmd walker fn should do
>>> proper check when increasing found_pages and return -ENOSPC properly when
>>> the same condition met. That should be enough, IMHO.
>> This check is needed in case we want to abort the walk at once. We return
>> negative value from here which aborts the walk. Returning negative value
>> from pmd_entry doesn't abort the walk. So this check is needed in the
>> test_walk.
>
> Why? What I see locally is (walk_pmd_range):
>
> if (ops->pmd_entry)
> err = ops->pmd_entry(pmd, addr, next, walk);
> if (err)
> break;
Sorry, mistake on my part. I'll correct it in next version (v9).
>
> Thanks,
>
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists