[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230125174512.ce5aed444cc8b8870825d8c2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:45:12 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux--csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, arch: add generic implementation of pfn_valid()
for FLATMEM
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:07:57 +0200 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> Every architecture that supports FLATMEM memory model defines its own
> version of pfn_valid() that essentially compares a pfn to max_mapnr.
>
> Use mips/powerpc version implemented as static inline as a generic
> implementation of pfn_valid() and drop its per-architecture definitions
arm allnoconfig:
./include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:23:19: error: static declaration of 'pfn_valid' follows non-static declaration
23 | static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
| ^~~~~~~~~
./arch/arm/include/asm/page.h:160:12: note: previous declaration of 'pfn_valid' with type 'int(long unsigned int)'
160 | extern int pfn_valid(unsigned long);
| ^~~~~~~~~
I thought of doing
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h~mm-arch-add-generic-implementation-of-pfn_valid-for-flatmem-fix
+++ a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
@@ -156,10 +156,6 @@ extern void copy_page(void *to, const vo
typedef struct page *pgtable_t;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
-extern int pfn_valid(unsigned long);
-#endif
-
#include <asm/memory.h>
#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
_
but I'm seeing a pfn_valid declaration in arch/arc/include/asm/page.h
which might be a problem.
v2, please ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists