[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230126151323.819534689@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:08:38 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org
Cc: will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
mark.rutland@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
jgross@...e.com, srivatsa@...il.mit.edu, amakhalov@...are.com,
pv-drivers@...are.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, rafael@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
frederic@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] cpuidle: Fix poll_idle() noinstr annotation
The instrumentation_begin()/end() annotations in poll_idle() were
complete nonsense. Specifically they caused tracing to happen in the
middle of noinstr code, resulting in RCU splats.
Now that local_clock() is noinstr, mark up the rest and let it rip.
Fixes: 00717eb8c955 ("cpuidle: Annotate poll_idle()")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202301192148.58ece903-oliver.sang@intel.com
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_devi
* @dev: the cpuidle device
*
*/
-u64 cpuidle_poll_time(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
+__cpuidle u64 cpuidle_poll_time(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
int i;
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cp
{
u64 time_start;
- instrumentation_begin();
time_start = local_clock();
dev->poll_time_limit = false;
@@ -42,7 +41,6 @@ static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cp
raw_local_irq_disable();
current_clr_polling();
- instrumentation_end();
return index;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists