[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230126151914.rhwhioz6yyhaq3z2@notapiano>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:19:14 -0500
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, weiqing.kong@...iatek.com,
jitao.shi@...iatek.com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: mtk-disp: Configure double buffering before
reading in .get_state()
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:06:15PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> The DISP_PWM controller's default behavior is to always use register
> double buffering: all reads/writes are then performed on shadow
> registers instead of working registers and this becomes an issue
> in case our chosen configuration in Linux is different from the
> default (or from the one that was pre-applied by the bootloader).
>
> An example of broken behavior is when the controller is configured
> to use shadow registers, but this driver wants to configure it
> otherwise: what happens is that the .get_state() callback is called
> right after registering the pwmchip and checks whether the PWM is
> enabled by reading the DISP_PWM_EN register;
> At this point, if shadow registers are enabled but their content
> was not committed before booting Linux, we are *not* reading the
> current PWM enablement status, leading to the kernel knowing that
> the hardware is actually enabled when, in reality, it's not.
>
> The aforementioned issue emerged since this driver was fixed with
> commit 0b5ef3429d8f ("pwm: mtk-disp: Fix the parameters calculated
> by the enabled flag of disp_pwm") making it to read the enablement
> status from the right register.
>
> Configure the controller in the .get_state() callback to avoid
> this desync issue and get the backlight properly working again.
>
> Fixes: 3f2b16734914 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .get_state()")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> index 82b430d881a2..fe9593f968ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,16 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> return err;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Apply DISP_PWM_DEBUG settings to choose whether to enable or disable
> + * registers double buffer and manual commit to working register before
> + * performing any read/write operation
> + */
> + if (mdp->data->bls_debug)
I feel like this condition should be the same as in the apply() callback, since
they're doing the same write operation, so also have '&& !has_commit'.
Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
On MT8192 Asurada Spherion.
Thanks,
Nícolas
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> + mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> + mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> +
> rate = clk_get_rate(mdp->clk_main);
> con0 = readl(mdp->base + mdp->data->con0);
> con1 = readl(mdp->base + mdp->data->con1);
> --
> 2.39.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists