linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] mm: replace vma->vm_flags direct modifications with modifier calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 08:10:26 -0800
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, michel@...pinasse.org,
        jglisse@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        hannes@...xchg.org, dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org,
        liam.howlett@...cle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, paulmck@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        will@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com,
        peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        hughd@...gle.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
        punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
        peterjung1337@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        axelrasmussen@...gle.com, joelaf@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
        jannh@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com, tatashin@...gle.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com, gurua@...gle.com,
        arjunroy@...gle.com, soheil@...gle.com, hughlynch@...gle.com,
        leewalsh@...gle.com, posk@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] mm: replace vma->vm_flags direct modifications
 with modifier calls

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:10 AM Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:35:51PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Replace direct modifications to vma->vm_flags with calls to modifier
> > functions to be able to track flag changes and to keep vma locking
> > correctness.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>
> Minor comments that are safe to ignore.
>
> I think a better name for mod_vm_flags is set_clear_vm_flags to hint that
> the first flags are to be set and the second flags are to be cleared.
> For this patch, it doesn't matter, but it might avoid accidental swapping
> in the future.
>
> reset_vm_flags might also be better named as reinit_vma_flags (or
> vma_flags_reinit). Maybe also encourage the use of [set|clear_mod]_vm_flags
> where possible in the comment to track exactly what is changing and
> why. Some cases like userfaultfd just want to clear __VM_UFFD_FLAGS but
> altering the flow in this patch is inappropriate and error prone. Others
> such as the infiniband changes and madvise are a lot more complex.

That's a good point, but I don't want people to use mod_vm_flags() for
the cases when the order of set/clear really matters. In such cases
set_vm_flags() and clear_vm_flags() should be explicitly used. Maybe
to make that clear I should add a comment and rewrite the functions
as:

void mod_vm_flags(vma, set, clear) {
    vma.vm_flags = vma.vm_flags | set & clear;
}

In this patchset it's not that obvious but mod_vm_flags() was really
introduced in the original per-VMA lock patchset for efficiency to
avoid taking extra per-VMA locks. A combo of
set_vm_flags()+clear_vm_flags() would try to retake the same per-VMA
lock in the second call while mod_vm_flags() takes the lock only once
and does both operations. Not a huge overhead because we check if the
lock is already taken and bail out early but still...
So, would the above modification to mod_vm_flags() address your concern?

>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs