[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1eff0411-430d-25d2-f1c6-41b22ff3938f@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:11:26 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Li Chen <me@...ux.beauty>
Cc: li chen <lchen@...arella.com>,
michael turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
stephen boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
rob herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
krzysztof kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"moderated list:arm/ambarella soc support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:common clk framework" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:open firmware and flattened device tree bindings"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arnd bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add Ambarella clock bindings
On 27/01/2023 15:48, Li Chen wrote:
> > This is independent topic. SoC-specific compatibles are a requirement
> > but it does not affect your device hierarchy.
>
> Thanks, "requirement" makes things much more clear. So I will always use SoC-specific compatibles even
> if different Amarella SoCs may share the same reg offset and setting.
Just please read before sending any new versions:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists