linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add Ambarella clock bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:11:26 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Li Chen <me@...ux.beauty>
Cc:     li chen <lchen@...arella.com>,
        michael turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        stephen boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        rob herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        krzysztof kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "moderated list:arm/ambarella soc support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:common clk framework" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:open firmware and flattened device tree bindings" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        arnd bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add Ambarella clock bindings

On 27/01/2023 15:48, Li Chen wrote:
>  > This is independent topic. SoC-specific compatibles are a requirement
>  > but it does not affect your device hierarchy.
>  
> Thanks, "requirement" makes things much more clear. So I will always use SoC-specific compatibles even
> if different Amarella SoCs may share the same reg offset and setting.

Just please read before sending any new versions:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst

Best regards,
Krzysztof