[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9P301c/cQ/wLTMs@sol.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:12:03 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: suppress KMSAN reports in arch_within_stack_frames()
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:40:47PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:40:45PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 06:23:05PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > > arch_within_stack_frames() performs stack walking and may confuse
> > > KMSAN by stepping on stale shadow values. To prevent false positive
> > > reports, disable KMSAN checks in this function.
> > >
> > > This fixes KMSAN's interoperability with CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY.
> > >
> > > Link: https://github.com/google/kmsan/issues/89
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3b9AAEKp2Vr3e6O@sol.localdomain/
> > > Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 5 +++++
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > Tested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> >
>
> Can this patch be applied to the x86 tree, please?
>
> - Eric
Ping.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists