[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9QSCWrijb0R1lnu@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:03:53 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/highmem: Align-down to page the address for
kunmap_flush_on_unmap()
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 06:58:55PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On giovedì 26 gennaio 2023 21:07:53 CET Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 03:33:46PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > If ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined (PA-RISC case), __kunmap_local()
> > > calls kunmap_flush_on_unmap(). The latter currently flushes the wrong
> > > address (as confirmed by Matthew Wilcox and Helge Deller). Al Viro
> > > proposed to call kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page
> > > address in order to fix this issue. Consensus has been reached on this
> > > solution.
> > >
> > > Therefore, if ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined, call
> > > kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page address computed with
> > > the PTR_ALIGN_DOWN() macro.
> >
> > You missed a spot. Sent the version I've had in my tree for a few days.
>
> I'm sorry for missing the other call site.
> Furthermore, your patch has a better commit message.
>
> However, I'm also sorry because I would have expected a different kind of
> support from you. My patch could have been improved with v2.
>
> Anyway, I assume that you missed that I had asked you and Al if anybody were
> interested in doing these changes and probably you missed also that Ira
> encouraged me to send a patch, whereas you did not show any interest...
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3146373.5fSG56mABF@suse/
Sorry; I get too much email and I missed the last six emails in that
thread (just went back and read them). According to git, I committed
this patch to my tree on Jan 20th, so if I'd read your email, I would
have told you to not bother.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists