[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSRbay5bEUMJngpj+6Ss=WLeRoyJaNNMip+TyTkTJ6=Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:42:19 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in
> > consultation with Steve Grubb.
> >
> > Richard Guy Briggs (2):
> > io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE
> > io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR
> >
> > io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just
> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3.
Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ...
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists