[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9RKaEzZ9tSKW1ZB@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:04:24 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, like.xu.linux@...il.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com,
Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return
perf capabilities
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index b28be793de29..59bdd9873fb5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2360,6 +2360,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
> if (guest_efer != host_efer)
> exec_control |= VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> + exec_control &= ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL;
> +
> vm_entry_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>
> /*
> @@ -2374,6 +2378,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
> exec_control |= VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> else
> exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> + exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL;
This is wrong. If KVM doesn't enumerate suport to L1, then L1's value needs to
be preserved on entry/exit to/from L1<->L2. I.e. just delete these lines.
> vm_exit_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 2ab4c33b5008..359da38a19a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
> { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER, VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER },
> { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS, VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS },
> { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL, VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL },
> + { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL, VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL },
> };
>
> memset(vmcs_conf, 0, sizeof(*vmcs_conf));
> @@ -4794,6 +4795,9 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
>
> vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(vcpu, vmx);
> +
> + if (!init_event && cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);
This belongs in init_vmcs().
> }
>
> static void vmx_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -6191,6 +6195,10 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL)
> pr_err("PerfGlobCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
> vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL));
> + if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&
Follow every other field and check the VMCS support, not the cap.
> + vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
> + pr_err("ArchLBRCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
> + vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL));
> if (vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)
> pr_err("BndCfgS = 0x%016llx\n", vmcs_read64(GUEST_BNDCFGS));
> pr_err("Interruptibility = %08x ActivityState = %08x\n",
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index a3da84f4ea45..f68c8a53a248 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
> VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER | \
> VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS | \
> VM_ENTRY_PT_CONCEAL_PIP | \
> - VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> + VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL | \
> + VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
>
> #define __KVM_REQUIRED_VMX_VM_EXIT_CONTROLS \
> (VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS | \
> @@ -515,7 +516,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
> VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER | \
> VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS | \
> VM_EXIT_PT_CONCEAL_PIP | \
> - VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> + VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL | \
> + VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL)
Enabling these flags by default is wrong. KVM will clear LBR_CTL on VM-Exit when
arch LBRs are supported, and AFAICT, never restore the host's values. And that
will happen regardless of whether or not the guest is using arch LBRs. I assume
the correct approach is to toggle these fields, but I'll be damned if I can figure
out what the intended behavior of the existing LBR suport is. I'll follow up in
the cover letter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists