linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 31/35] Documentation: trace: correct spelling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9fc96bce-630d-3f2c-eab7-1270251fbb5b@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:01:25 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/35] Documentation: trace: correct spelling



On 1/27/23 00:54, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 1/27/23 07:40, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ In Linux terms, the runtime verification
>>  *RV monitor* abstraction. A *RV monitor* includes a reference model of the
>>  system, a set of instances of the monitor (per-cpu monitor, per-task monitor,
>>  and so on), and the helper functions that glue the monitor to the system via
>> -trace, as depicted bellow::
>> +trace, as depicted below::
>>  
>>   Linux   +---- RV Monitor ----------------------------------+ Formal
>>    Realm  |                                                  |  Realm
> 
> Do you mind making the rv part an independent patch?
> 
> Spiting it helps in the backport of the fix to stable/distro kernels.

I wouldn't expect this to be packported. stable-kernel-rules.rst says:

 - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
   whitespace cleanups, etc).

-- 
~Randy