[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9RZPFTA8UUam12R@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:07:40 -0500
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates
On 2023-01-27 16:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/27/23 3:53 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> >> On 1/27/23 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> >>>> On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >>>>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in
> >>>>>>> consultation with Steve Grubb.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2):
> >>>>>>> io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE
> >>>>>>> io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++-
> >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just
> >>>>>> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ...
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it
> >>>> simmer until people have had a chance to do so.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks. FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots
> >>> of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we
> >>> were on the same page.
> >>
> >> Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch
> >> submissions? Getting these:
> >>
> >> Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval
> >>
> >> on every reply is really annoying.
> >
> > We kinda need audit related stuff on the linux-audit list, that's our
> > mailing list for audit stuff.
>
> Sure, but then it should be open. Or do separate postings or something.
> CC'ing a closed list with open lists and sending email to people that
> are not on that closed list is bad form.
I've made an inquiry.
> Jens Axboe
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
Powered by blists - more mailing lists