[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230127064005.1558-18-rdunlap@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:39:47 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/35] Documentation: locking: correct spelling
Correct spelling problems for Documentation/locking/ as reported
by codespell.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
---
Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst | 4 ++--
Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ the validator will shoot a splat if inco
A lock-class's behavior is constructed by its instances collectively:
when the first instance of a lock-class is used after bootup the class
gets registered, then all (subsequent) instances will be mapped to the
-class and hence their usages and dependecies will contribute to those of
+class and hence their usages and dependencies will contribute to those of
the class. A lock-class does not go away when a lock instance does, but
it can be removed if the memory space of the lock class (static or
dynamic) is reclaimed, this happens for example when a module is
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ exact case is for the lock as of the rep
+--------------+-------------+--------------+
The character '-' suggests irq is disabled because if otherwise the
-charactor '?' would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
+character '?' would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
applied for '+' too.
Unused locks (e.g., mutexes) cannot be part of the cause of an error.
diff -- a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ stutter
without pausing.
shuffle_interval
- The number of seconds to keep the test threads affinitied
+ The number of seconds to keep the test threads affined
to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 3 seconds.
Used in conjunction with test_no_idle_hz.
diff -- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ caveats also apply to bit spinlocks.
Some bit spinlocks are replaced with regular spinlock_t for PREEMPT_RT
using conditional (#ifdef'ed) code changes at the usage site. In contrast,
usage-site changes are not needed for the spinlock_t substitution.
-Instead, conditionals in header files and the core locking implemementation
+Instead, conditionals in header files and the core locking implementation
enable the compiler to do the substitution transparently.
diff -- a/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst b/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ critical variables. Another example::
int buf[NR_CPUS];
set_cpu_val(buf);
- if (buf[smp_processor_id()] == -1) printf(KERN_INFO "wee!\n");
+ if (buf[smp_processor_id()] == -1) printf(KERN_INFO "whee!\n");
spin_lock(&buf_lock);
/* ... */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists