[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8992f62-06e6-b183-3ab5-8118343efb3f@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 19:20:25 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: dsterba@...e.cz, Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Murphy <lists@...orremedies.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!
On 1/26/23 17:42, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether these options are better than just increasing the
>> number, maybe to unblock your ASAP, you can try make it 30 and make sure
>> you have large enough memory to test.
> About just to increase the LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS by 1. Where should this
> be done? In vanilla kernel on kernel.org? In a specific distribution?
> or the user must rebuild the kernel himself? Maybe increase
> LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS by 1 is most reliable solution, but it difficult
> to distribute to end users because the meaning of using packaged
> distributions is lost (user should change LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS in
> config and rebuild the kernel by yourself).
Note that lockdep is typically only enabled in a debug kernel shipped by
a distro because of the high performance overhead. The non-debug kernel
doesn't have lockdep enabled. When LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS isn't big enough
when testing on the debug kernel, you can file a ticket to the distro
asking for an increase in CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_BITS. Or you can build
your own debug kernel with a bigger CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_BITS.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists