linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpiolib: move of_gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:46:59 +0100
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] gpiolib: move of_gpio_flags into gpiolib-of.c

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023, at 10:43, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 03:47:42PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023, at 15:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:28:01PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> > >>
>> > >> There is no need for this in the header any more, it's just
>> > >> an implementation detail now.
>> > >
>> > > I have published
>> > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112145140.67573-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
>> > > Can it be used?
>> >
>> > Sure, I added a Reviewed-by: on that now. Your patch will conflict
>> > with my patch 7/8, but we can work that out.
>>
>> Either Bart takes it independently or you may attach it into your series.
>> Bart?
>>
>
> I applied it to my for-next branch, is that fine?

That's fine, I'll make sure to rebase patch 7 on top of that before
I resend it. The two are functionally independent but touch adjacent
lines.

     Arnd