linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] vdso/bits.h: Add BIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9Omb/OG4zjp/Xqq@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:24:47 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] vdso/bits.h: Add BIT_ULL() for the sake of
 consistency

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 04:10:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> While the minimization is a good thing, the split added some
> inconsistency since BIT() and BIT_ULL() defined in the different
> files and confuses unprepared reader. Let's move BIT_ULL()
> to vdso/bits.h, so they will go together (as UL(), ULL() and
> so on).

Any comments on this?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko