[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9Oy9ZAj/DQ7O+6e@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 12:18:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@...ray.eu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/atomic: atomic: Use arch_atomic_{read,set} in
generic atomic ops
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:33:54PM +0100, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> @@ -58,9 +61,11 @@ static inline int generic_atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v) \
> static inline void generic_atomic_##op(int i, atomic_t *v) \
> { \
> unsigned long flags; \
> + int c; \
> \
> raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
> - v->counter = v->counter c_op i; \
> + c = arch_atomic_read(v); \
> + arch_atomic_set(v, c c_op i); \
> raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
> }
This and the others like it are a bit sad, it explicitly dis-allows the
compiler from using memops and forces a load-store.
The alternative is writing it like:
*(volatile int *)&v->counter c_op i;
but that's pretty shit too I suppose.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists