linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: realtek: align UART node name with bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d03c3234-42e0-4357-2187-19ff9c7209a0@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:27:18 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: realtek: align UART node name with bindings

On 27/01/2023 13:22, Andreas Färber wrote:
> On 27.01.23 10:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:15:14 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Bindings expect UART/serial node names to be "serial".
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> Let me know if anyone preferred to take it via sub-arch/SoC maintainer tree.
>> I'll drop it then.
> 
> We did have an equivalent patch in '21, from Zhen Lei of Huawei, that I 
> gave a Reviewed-by for. So should you maybe apply that original patch 
> instead?

I don't have it in my inbox... but if you reviewed it, why didn't pick
it up? Or whoever is/was the maintainer? I personally do not care about
Realtek but I do care about bindings checks to succeed without warnings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof