[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbKmnviPb+JKM9CZuGHa1OTWdEeQw3B+qirhMMkhqDOQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:15:35 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] gpiolib: split linux/gpio/driver.h out of linux/gpio.h
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 2:28 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Almost all gpio drivers include linux/gpio/driver.h, and other
> files should not rely on includes from this header.
>
> Remove the indirect include from here and include the correct
> headers directly from where they are used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Makes the kernel look better after than before so:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
I was going to send this to Bartosz but don't want us falling over
each other, however consider the approach I use to get rid of
<linux/gpio/driver.h> here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/log/?h=gpiochip-no-driver-h
(My patch set was at least approved by the build bots.)
Comparing the approaches it seems you need these two, feel free to
cherry-pick to avoid build errors from the bots:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/commit/?h=gpiochip-no-driver-h&id=89f4f9cc70c686303679e57bdc3ac86507979fe3
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/commit/?h=gpiochip-no-driver-h&id=73ca8058a7b2075c993040bdc92b6a82f57d4316
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists