[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda2WQsGyBaZp2mdjphBppyyF1pwQvqDkBZ1F_q5icwdBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:34:52 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] gpiolib: coldfire: remove custom asm/gpio.h
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:12 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Now that coldfire is the only user of a custom asm/gpio.h, it seems
> better to remove this as well, and have the same interface everywhere.
>
> For the gpio_get_value()/gpio_set_value()/gpio_to_irq(), gpio_cansleep()
> functions, the custom version is only a micro-optimization to inline the
> function for constant GPIO numbers. However, in the coldfire defconfigs,
> I was unable to find a single instance where this micro-optimization
> was even used, and according to Geert the only user appears to be the
> QSPI chip that is disabled everywhere.
>
> The custom gpio_request_one() function is even less useful, as it is
> guarded by an #ifdef that is never true.
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists