lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4fa85b15-1c55-9050-9cd0-fe66c3b957eb@canonical.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:34:47 -0800 From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com> To: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com Subject: Re: [linus:master] [apparmor] 1ad22fcc4d: stress-ng.kill.ops_per_sec -42.5% regression On 1/27/23 17:37, Yin, Fengwei wrote: > Hi John, > > On 12/31/2022 3:18 PM, kernel test robot wrote: >> >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -42.5% regression of stress-ng.kill.ops_per_sec due to commit: >> >> >> commit: 1ad22fcc4d0d2fb2e0f35aed555a86d016d5e590 ("apparmor: rework profile->rules to be a list") >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master >> >> in testcase: stress-ng >> on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz (Cascade Lake) with 512G memory >> with following parameters: >> >> nr_threads: 10% >> disk: 1HDD >> testtime: 60s >> fs: ext4 >> class: os >> test: kill >> cpufreq_governor: performance > Do you think any other information need be collected for this regression > report? Thanks. > no, I know what is causing it, I just haven't had time to fix it yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists