[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64b7e7f1-44ff-09fe-c292-40eaa30a76a1@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:52:00 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] thermal: mediatek: control buffer enablement
tweaks
On 27/01/2023 23:21, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote:
>
> On 1/27/23 22:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 27/01/2023 16:44, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote:
>>> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>>>
>>> Add logic in order to be able to turn on the control buffer on MT8365.
>>> This change now allows to have control buffer support for
>>> MTK_THERMAL_V1,
>>> and it allows to define the register offset, and mask used to enable it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@...libre.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> index 8440692e3890..d8ddceb75372 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
>>> @@ -271,6 +271,9 @@ struct mtk_thermal_data {
>>> bool need_switch_bank;
>>> struct thermal_bank_cfg bank_data[MAX_NUM_ZONES];
>>> enum mtk_thermal_version version;
>>> + u32 apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg;
>>> + u32 apmixed_buffer_ctl_mask;
>>> + u32 apmixed_buffer_ctl_set;
>>> };
>>> struct mtk_thermal {
>>> @@ -514,6 +517,9 @@ static const struct mtk_thermal_data
>>> mt7622_thermal_data = {
>>> .adcpnp = mt7622_adcpnp,
>>> .sensor_mux_values = mt7622_mux_values,
>>> .version = MTK_THERMAL_V2,
>>> + .apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg = APMIXED_SYS_TS_CON1,
>>> + .apmixed_buffer_ctl_mask = GENMASK(31, 6) | BIT(3),
>>> + .apmixed_buffer_ctl_set = BIT(0),
>>> };
>>> /*
>>> @@ -963,14 +969,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>>> mtk_thermal_of_match[] = {
>>> };
>>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_thermal_of_match);
>>> -static void mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(void __iomem *apmixed_base)
>>> +static void mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(struct mtk_thermal *mt,
>>> + void __iomem *apmixed_base)
>>> {
>>> - int tmp;
>>> + u32 tmp;
>>> +
>>> + if (!mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg)
>>> + return;
>>> - tmp = readl(apmixed_base + APMIXED_SYS_TS_CON1);
>>> - tmp &= ~(0x37);
>>> - tmp |= 0x1;
>>> - writel(tmp, apmixed_base + APMIXED_SYS_TS_CON1);
>>> + tmp = readl(apmixed_base + mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg);
>>> + tmp &= mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_mask;
>>> + tmp |= mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_set;
>>> + writel(tmp, apmixed_base + mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg);
>>> udelay(200);
>>> }
>>> @@ -1070,8 +1080,9 @@ static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>> goto err_disable_clk_auxadc;
>>> }
>>> + mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(mt, apmixed_base);
>>> +
>>> if (mt->conf->version == MTK_THERMAL_V2) {
>>> - mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(apmixed_base);
>>> mtk_thermal_release_periodic_ts(mt, auxadc_base);
>>> }
>>
>> This change conflicts with commit 4f2ee0aa2e706
>>
>> I fixed it with:
>>
>> - if (mt->conf->version != MTK_THERMAL_V1) {
>> - mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(apmixed_base);
>> + mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(apmixed_base);
>> +
>> + if (mt->conf->version != MTK_THERMAL_V1)
>> mtk_thermal_release_periodic_ts(mt, auxadc_base);
>> - }
>>
> I think it's rather MTK_THERMAL_V2 and not MTK_THERMAL_V1. Other than
> that, it looks
It was before if (version == MTK_THERMAL_V2). Now there is a V3, so it
is replaced by if (version != MTK_THERMAL_V1) in order to include the V3
>> Let me know if there is something wrong.
>>
>>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists