[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <185f7c4354e.afe15657487769.5617846622807925893@linux.beauty>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 17:45:09 +0800
From: Li Chen <me@...ux.beauty>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: "li chen" <lchen@...arella.com>,
"michael turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"stephen boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"rob herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"moderated list:arm/ambarella soc support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:common clk framework" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:open firmware and flattened device tree bindings"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add Ambarella clock bindings
Hi Krzysztof,
---- On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 23:11:26 +0800 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote ---
> On 27/01/2023 15:48, Li Chen wrote:
> > > This is independent topic. SoC-specific compatibles are a requirement
> > > but it does not affect your device hierarchy.
> >
> > Thanks, "requirement" makes things much more clear. So I will always use SoC-specific compatibles even
> > if different Amarella SoCs may share the same reg offset and setting.
>
> Just please read before sending any new versions:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst
Gotcha.
Regards,
Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists