lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <989046e3-b288-d966-1d21-2fccabdcb72d@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 28 Jan 2023 17:54:14 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: move ipu_policy definitions to separated file

On 2023/1/20 21:40, Yangtao Li wrote:
> User can control f2fs ipu policy through /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/ipu_policy,
> export related definitions and introduce new macro to make it more
> convenient for users to use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 25 ++++++------
>   fs/f2fs/segment.c                       |  2 +-
>   fs/f2fs/segment.h                       | 37 ++---------------
>   fs/f2fs/super.c                         |  2 +-
>   fs/f2fs/sysfs.c                         |  2 +-
>   include/uapi/linux/f2fs.h               | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   6 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> index 64b15a28fe30..d05ad2bc56d1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs
> @@ -49,18 +49,19 @@ Contact:	"Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
>   Description:	Controls the in-place-update policy.
>   		updates in f2fs. User can set:
>   
> -		====  =================
> -		0x01  F2FS_IPU_FORCE
> -		0x02  F2FS_IPU_SSR
> -		0x04  F2FS_IPU_UTIL
> -		0x08  F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL
> -		0x10  F2FS_IPU_FSYNC
> -		0x20  F2FS_IPU_ASYNC
> -		0x40  F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE
> -		0x80  F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE
> -		====  =================
> -
> -		Refer segment.h for details.
> +		====  ============================
> +		0x00  SET_F2FS_IPU_DISABLE
> +		0x01  SET_F2FS_IPU_FORCE
> +		0x02  SET_F2FS_IPU_SSR
> +		0x04  SET_F2FS_IPU_UTIL
> +		0x08  SET_F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL
> +		0x10  SET_F2FS_IPU_FSYNC
> +		0x20  SET_F2FS_IPU_ASYNC
> +		0x40  SET_F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE
> +		0x80  SET_F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE
> +		====  ============================
> +
> +		Refer include/uapi/linux/f2fs.h for details.
>   
>   What:		/sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/min_ipu_util
>   Date:		November 2013
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index a007f5084e84..c56f5a80d3a6 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -5138,7 +5138,7 @@ int f2fs_build_segment_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   		sm_info->rec_prefree_segments = DEF_MAX_RECLAIM_PREFREE_SEGMENTS;
>   
>   	if (!f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi))
> -		sm_info->ipu_policy = BIT(F2FS_IPU_FSYNC);
> +		sm_info->ipu_policy = SET_F2FS_IPU_FSYNC;
>   	sm_info->min_ipu_util = DEF_MIN_IPU_UTIL;
>   	sm_info->min_fsync_blocks = DEF_MIN_FSYNC_BLOCKS;
>   	sm_info->min_seq_blocks = sbi->blocks_per_seg;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> index 50c63155ad56..c064ddffe91b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>    */
>   #include <linux/blkdev.h>
>   #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/f2fs.h>
>   
>   /* constant macro */
>   #define NULL_SEGNO			((unsigned int)(~0))
> @@ -646,51 +647,19 @@ static inline int utilization(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   					sbi->user_block_count);
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * Sometimes f2fs may be better to drop out-of-place update policy.
> - * And, users can control the policy through sysfs entries.
> - * There are five policies with triggering conditions as follows.
> - * F2FS_IPU_FORCE - all the time,
> - * F2FS_IPU_SSR - if SSR mode is activated,
> - * F2FS_IPU_UTIL - if FS utilization is over threashold,
> - * F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL - if SSR mode is activated and FS utilization is over
> - *                     threashold,
> - * F2FS_IPU_FSYNC - activated in fsync path only for high performance flash
> - *                     storages. IPU will be triggered only if the # of dirty
> - *                     pages over min_fsync_blocks. (=default option)
> - * F2FS_IPU_ASYNC - do IPU given by asynchronous write requests.
> - * F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE - disable IPU bio cache.
> - * F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE - use OPU write prior to IPU write if inode has
> - *                            FI_OPU_WRITE flag.
> - * F2FS_IPU_DISABLE - disable IPU. (=default option in LFS mode)
> - */

IMO, we'd better to move these comments into sysfs-fs-f2fs as ipu_policy
interface's documents.

>   #define DEF_MIN_IPU_UTIL	70
>   #define DEF_MIN_FSYNC_BLOCKS	8
>   #define DEF_MIN_HOT_BLOCKS	16
>   
>   #define SMALL_VOLUME_SEGMENTS	(16 * 512)	/* 16GB */
>   
> -#define F2FS_IPU_DISABLE	0
> -
> -/* Modification on enum should be synchronized with ipu_mode_names array */
> -enum {
> -	F2FS_IPU_FORCE,
> -	F2FS_IPU_SSR,
> -	F2FS_IPU_UTIL,
> -	F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL,
> -	F2FS_IPU_FSYNC,
> -	F2FS_IPU_ASYNC,
> -	F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE,
> -	F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE,
> -	F2FS_IPU_MAX,
> -};
> -
>   #define F2FS_IPU_POLICY(name)					\
>   static inline int IS_##name(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)		\
>   {								\
> -	return SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy & BIT(name);		\
> +	return TEST_##name(SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy);		\
>   }
>   
> +F2FS_IPU_POLICY(F2FS_IPU_DISABLE);
>   F2FS_IPU_POLICY(F2FS_IPU_FORCE);
>   F2FS_IPU_POLICY(F2FS_IPU_SSR);
>   F2FS_IPU_POLICY(F2FS_IPU_UTIL);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index ebc76683f05d..b19085fa335a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -4085,7 +4085,7 @@ static void f2fs_tuning_parameters(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   		if (f2fs_block_unit_discard(sbi))
>   			SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->discard_granularity = MIN_DISCARD_GRANULARITY;
>   		if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode != FS_MODE_LFS)
> -			SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy = BIT(F2FS_IPU_FORCE) | BIT(F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE);
> +			SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy = SET_F2FS_IPU_FORCE | SET_F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE;
>   	}
>   
>   	sbi->readdir_ra = true;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> index aaf5d8650518..375ace5f330d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static ssize_t ipu_mode_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>   {
>   	int len = 0, i = 0;
>   
> -	if (SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy == F2FS_IPU_DISABLE)
> +	if (IS_F2FS_IPU_DISABLE(sbi))
>   		return sysfs_emit(buf, "DISABLE\n");
>   
>   	for_each_set_bit(i, &SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy, F2FS_IPU_MAX)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/f2fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/f2fs.h
> index 955d440be104..1b672fb6af91 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/f2fs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/f2fs.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,60 @@
>   #include <linux/types.h>
>   #include <linux/ioctl.h>
>   
> +/*
> + * For /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/ipu_policy entry
> + *
> + * Sometimes f2fs may be better to drop out-of-place update policy.
> + * And, users can control the policy through sysfs entries.
> + * There are five policies with triggering conditions as follows.
> + * F2FS_IPU_FORCE - all the time,
> + * F2FS_IPU_SSR - if SSR mode is activated,
> + * F2FS_IPU_UTIL - if FS utilization is over threashold,
> + * F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL - if SSR mode is activated and FS utilization is over
> + *                     threashold,
> + * F2FS_IPU_FSYNC - activated in fsync path only for high performance flash
> + *                     storages. IPU will be triggered only if the # of dirty
> + *                     pages over min_fsync_blocks. (=default option)
> + * F2FS_IPU_ASYNC - do IPU given by asynchronous write requests.
> + * F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE - disable IPU bio cache.
> + * F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE - use OPU write prior to IPU write if inode has
> + *                            FI_OPU_WRITE flag.
> + * F2FS_IPU_DISABLE - disable IPU. (=default option in LFS mode)
> + */
> +#define F2FS_IPU_DISABLE	0
> +/* Modification on enum should be synchronized with ipu_mode_names array */
> +enum {
> +	F2FS_IPU_FORCE,
> +	F2FS_IPU_SSR,
> +	F2FS_IPU_UTIL,
> +	F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL,
> +	F2FS_IPU_FSYNC,
> +	F2FS_IPU_ASYNC,
> +	F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE,
> +	F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE,
> +	F2FS_IPU_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_DISABLE				F2FS_IPU_DISABLE
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_FORCE					BIT(F2FS_IPU_FORCE)
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_SSR					BIT(F2FS_IPU_SSR)
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_UTIL					BIT(F2FS_IPU_UTIL)
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL				BIT(F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL)
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_FSYNC					BIT(F2FS_IPU_FSYNC)
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_ASYNC					BIT(F2FS_IPU_ASYNC)
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE				BIT(F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE)
> +#define SET_F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE		BIT(F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE)
> +
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_DISABLE(val)			((val) == F2FS_IPU_DISABLE)
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_FORCE(val)			((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_FORCE))
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_SSR(val)				((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_SSR))
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_UTIL(val)				((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_UTIL))
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL(val)			((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL))
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_FSYNC(val)			((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_FSYNC))
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_ASYNC(val)			((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_ASYNC))
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE(val)			((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE))
> +#define TEST_F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE(val)	((val) & BIT(F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE))

I don't see any strong reason to add these sysfs related definition to uapi,
according to other filesystems' implementation, I guess describing the usage
of ipu_policy clearly is enough.

Thanks,

> +
>   /*
>    * f2fs-specific ioctl commands
>    */

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ