[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ec49108-6ad8-daf7-54ec-104f0923a31d@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:48:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: bchihi@...libre.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, rafael@...nel.org,
amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, ye.xingchen@....com.cn,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
khilman@...libre.com, james.lo@...iatek.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal
controllers dt-binding definition
On 26/01/2023 17:10, bchihi@...libre.com wrote:
> From: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@...libre.com>
>
> Add LVTS thermal controllers dt-binding definition for mt8195.
Subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-binding definition". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
Plus two comments at the end.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@...libre.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v12:
> - Fixed subject prefix
> - Fixed licences GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
> - Added dual licenses
> + };
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..902d5b1e4f43
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
Same filename as bindings.
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or MIT) */
Although this is correct, any reason why not using exactly the same
license as bindings?
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 MediaTek Inc.
> + * Author: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@...libre.com>
> + */
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists