| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202301282334.C5NLDEZd-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 23:19:53 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: Store restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr() call state
Hi Waiman,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/master tip/auto-latest linux/master linus/master v6.2-rc5 next-20230127]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/sched-Store-restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr-call-state/20230128-155441
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127015527.466367-1-longman%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3] sched: Store restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr() call state
config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20230124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230128/202301282334.C5NLDEZd-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4196ca3278f78c6e19246e54ab0ecb364e37d66a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/25582b263f75c0348a967ce5da36c1f87fd5d175
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Waiman-Long/sched-Store-restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr-call-state/20230128-155441
git checkout 25582b263f75c0348a967ce5da36c1f87fd5d175
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/bpf/ kernel/sched/ net/core/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:9:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3021:9: error: no member named 'user_cpu_ptr' in 'struct task_struct'; did you mean 'user_cpus_ptr'?
if (p->user_cpu_ptr &&
^~~~~~~~~~~~
user_cpus_ptr
include/linux/sched.h:830:15: note: 'user_cpus_ptr' declared here
cpumask_t *user_cpus_ptr;
^
kernel/sched/core.c:3022:32: error: no member named 'user_cpu_ptr' in 'struct task_struct'; did you mean 'user_cpus_ptr'?
!cpumask_and(new_mask, p->user_cpu_ptr, subset_mask)) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~
user_cpus_ptr
include/linux/sched.h:830:15: note: 'user_cpus_ptr' declared here
cpumask_t *user_cpus_ptr;
^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3091:33: error: expected '}'
.new_mask = cpu_possible_mask;
^
kernel/sched/core.c:3090:31: note: to match this '{'
struct affinity_context ac = {
^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3092:3: error: expected expression
.flags = SCA_CLR_RESTRICT,
^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3097:2: error: expected identifier or '('
if (!data_race(p->cpus_allowed_restricted))
^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3104:2: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int]
ret = __sched_setaffinity(p, &ac);
^
int
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3104:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'p'
ret = __sched_setaffinity(p, &ac);
^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3104:32: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ac'
ret = __sched_setaffinity(p, &ac);
^
kernel/sched/core.c:3105:2: error: expected identifier or '('
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
^
include/asm-generic/bug.h:180:33: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON_ONCE'
#define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) WARN_ON(condition)
^
include/asm-generic/bug.h:166:29: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON'
#define WARN_ON(condition) ({ \
^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3105:2: error: expected ')'
include/asm-generic/bug.h:180:33: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON_ONCE'
#define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) WARN_ON(condition)
^
include/asm-generic/bug.h:166:29: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON'
#define WARN_ON(condition) ({ \
^
kernel/sched/core.c:3105:2: note: to match this '('
include/asm-generic/bug.h:180:33: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON_ONCE'
#define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) WARN_ON(condition)
^
include/asm-generic/bug.h:166:28: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON'
#define WARN_ON(condition) ({ \
^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:3106:1: error: extraneous closing brace ('}')
}
^
6 warnings and 11 errors generated.
vim +3021 kernel/sched/core.c
2986
2987 /*
2988 * Change a given task's CPU affinity to the intersection of its current
2989 * affinity mask and @subset_mask, writing the resulting mask to @new_mask.
2990 * The cpus_allowed_restricted bit is set to indicate to a later
2991 * relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() call to relax the cpumask.
2992 *
2993 * If the resulting mask is empty, leave the affinity unchanged and return
2994 * -EINVAL.
2995 */
2996 static int restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p,
2997 struct cpumask *new_mask,
2998 const struct cpumask *subset_mask)
2999 {
3000 struct affinity_context ac = {
3001 .new_mask = new_mask,
3002 .flags = 0,
3003 };
3004 struct rq_flags rf;
3005 struct rq *rq;
3006 int err;
3007
3008 rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
3009 p->cpus_allowed_restricted = 1;
3010
3011 /*
3012 * Forcefully restricting the affinity of a deadline task is
3013 * likely to cause problems, so fail and noisily override the
3014 * mask entirely.
3015 */
3016 if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) {
3017 err = -EPERM;
3018 goto err_unlock;
3019 }
3020
> 3021 if (p->user_cpu_ptr &&
> 3022 !cpumask_and(new_mask, p->user_cpu_ptr, subset_mask)) {
3023 err = -EINVAL;
3024 goto err_unlock;
3025 }
3026
3027 return __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked(p, &ac, rq, &rf);
3028
3029 err_unlock:
3030 task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
3031 return err;
3032 }
3033
3034 /*
3035 * Restrict the CPU affinity of task @p so that it is a subset of
3036 * task_cpu_possible_mask(). If the resulting mask is empty, we warn
3037 * and walk up the cpuset hierarchy until we find a suitable mask.
3038 */
3039 void force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
3040 {
3041 cpumask_var_t new_mask;
3042 const struct cpumask *override_mask = task_cpu_possible_mask(p);
3043
3044 alloc_cpumask_var(&new_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
3045
3046 /*
3047 * __migrate_task() can fail silently in the face of concurrent
3048 * offlining of the chosen destination CPU, so take the hotplug
3049 * lock to ensure that the migration succeeds.
3050 */
3051 cpus_read_lock();
3052 if (!cpumask_available(new_mask))
3053 goto out_set_mask;
3054
3055 if (!restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, new_mask, override_mask))
3056 goto out_free_mask;
3057
3058 /*
3059 * We failed to find a valid subset of the affinity mask for the
3060 * task, so override it based on its cpuset hierarchy.
3061 */
3062 cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, new_mask);
3063 override_mask = new_mask;
3064
3065 out_set_mask:
3066 if (printk_ratelimit()) {
3067 printk_deferred("Overriding affinity for process %d (%s) to CPUs %*pbl\n",
3068 task_pid_nr(p), p->comm,
3069 cpumask_pr_args(override_mask));
3070 }
3071
3072 WARN_ON(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, override_mask));
3073 out_free_mask:
3074 cpus_read_unlock();
3075 free_cpumask_var(new_mask);
3076 }
3077
3078 static int
3079 __sched_setaffinity(struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *ctx);
3080
3081 /*
3082 * Restore the affinity of a task @p which was previously restricted by a
3083 * call to force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr().
3084 *
3085 * It is the caller's responsibility to serialise this with any calls to
3086 * force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(@p).
3087 */
3088 void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
3089 {
> 3090 struct affinity_context ac = {
> 3091 .new_mask = cpu_possible_mask;
> 3092 .flags = SCA_CLR_RESTRICT,
3093 };
3094 int ret;
3095
3096 /* Return if no previous force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() call */
> 3097 if (!data_race(p->cpus_allowed_restricted))
3098 return;
3099
3100 /*
3101 * Try to restore the old affinity mask with __sched_setaffinity().
3102 * Cpuset masking will be done there too.
3103 */
> 3104 ret = __sched_setaffinity(p, &ac);
> 3105 WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> 3106 }
3107
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists