[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9RyyvqKDqX3ZNY9@google.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:56:42 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiaxi Chen <jiaxi.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jing Liu <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SVM: drop the SVM specific H_FLAGS
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> @@ -3580,7 +3583,7 @@ bool svm_nmi_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return false;
>
> ret = (vmcb->control.int_state & SVM_INTERRUPT_SHADOW_MASK) ||
> - (vcpu->arch.hflags & HF_NMI_MASK);
> + (svm->nmi_masked);
Unnecessary parantheses.
>
> return ret;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists