linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: dts: exynos: move exynos-bus nodes out of soc in Exynos4210

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a2a97325-cfdc-5ab0-6abf-8774ff0ac9fd@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 29 Jan 2023 11:42:04 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     replicant@...osl.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        Martin Jücker <martin.juecker@...il.com>,
        Henrik Grimler <henrik@...mler.se>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: dts: exynos: move exynos-bus nodes out of soc in
 Exynos4210

On 25/01/2023 10:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The soc node is supposed to have only device nodes with MMIO addresses,
> as reported by dtc W=1:
> 
>   exynos4210.dtsi:218.20-224.5:
>     Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus-dmc: missing or empty reg/ranges property
> 
> and dtbs_check:
> 
>   exynos4210-i9100.dtb: soc: bus-dmc:
>     {'compatible': ['samsung,exynos-bus'], 'clocks': [[5, 457]], 'clock-names': ['bus'], 'operating-points-v2': [[82]], 'status': ['disabled']} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
> 
> Move the bus nodes and their OPP tables out of SoC to fix this.
> Re-order them alphabetically while moving and put some of the OPP tables
> in device nodes (if they are not shared).
> 

Applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof