linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: Add cap-aggressive-pm property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b43f26c9-f76c-c898-aadc-ce3ee7b7823d@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 29 Jan 2023 11:58:55 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Hermes Zhang <chenhuiz@...s.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     kernel@...s.com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: Add cap-aggressive-pm property

On 29/01/2023 03:36, Hermes Zhang wrote:
> This commit add a new property: cap-aggressive-pm to enable the

Do not use "This commit/patch".
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95

> MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM feature for (e)MMC/SD power saving.

Why this is a property suitable for DT? IOW, why this isn't enabled always?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hermes Zhang <chenhuiz@...s.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Best regards,
Krzysztof