linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/313] 6.1.9-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y9gDLmmAwaKZX9yw@spud>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:49:34 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/313] 6.1.9-rc1 review

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:47:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.9 release.
> There are 313 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:42:39 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Apart from the build issue that Guenter reported, things look fine on my
hardware.

> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>     dt-bindings: riscv: fix single letter canonical order
> 
> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>     dt-bindings: riscv: fix underscore requirement for multi-letter extensions

I think the email for these came in over the weekend but I was busy
unfortunately. Is dt-binding stuff like this usually backported?
I suppose there's no harm in making sure that it is correct...

Thanks,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)