| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:39:47 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>,
Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...i.sm>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@...nel.org>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] of: property: Simplify of_link_to_phandle()
Hi Saravana,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 04:11:36PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> The driver core now:
> - Has the parent device of a supplier pick up the consumers if the
> supplier never has a device created for it.
> - Ignores a supplier if the supplier has no parent device and will never
> be probed by a driver
>
> And already prevents creating a device link with the consumer as a
> supplier of a parent.
>
> So, we no longer need to find the "compatible" node of the supplier or
> do any other checks in of_link_to_phandle(). We simply need to make sure
> that the supplier is available in DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 84 +++++++------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 134cfc980b70..c651aad6f34b 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1062,20 +1062,6 @@ of_fwnode_device_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> return of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> }
>
> -static bool of_is_ancestor_of(struct device_node *test_ancestor,
> - struct device_node *child)
> -{
> - of_node_get(child);
> - while (child) {
> - if (child == test_ancestor) {
> - of_node_put(child);
> - return true;
> - }
> - child = of_get_next_parent(child);
> - }
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static struct device_node *of_get_compat_node(struct device_node *np)
> {
> of_node_get(np);
> @@ -1106,71 +1092,27 @@ static struct device_node *of_get_compat_node_parent(struct device_node *np)
> return node;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * of_link_to_phandle - Add fwnode link to supplier from supplier phandle
> - * @con_np: consumer device tree node
> - * @sup_np: supplier device tree node
> - *
> - * Given a phandle to a supplier device tree node (@sup_np), this function
> - * finds the device that owns the supplier device tree node and creates a
> - * device link from @dev consumer device to the supplier device. This function
> - * doesn't create device links for invalid scenarios such as trying to create a
> - * link with a parent device as the consumer of its child device. In such
> - * cases, it returns an error.
> - *
> - * Returns:
> - * - 0 if fwnode link successfully created to supplier
> - * - -EINVAL if the supplier link is invalid and should not be created
> - * - -ENODEV if struct device will never be create for supplier
> - */
> -static int of_link_to_phandle(struct device_node *con_np,
> +static void of_link_to_phandle(struct device_node *con_np,
> struct device_node *sup_np)
> {
> - struct device *sup_dev;
> - struct device_node *tmp_np = sup_np;
> + struct device_node *tmp_np = of_node_get(sup_np);
>
> - /*
> - * Find the device node that contains the supplier phandle. It may be
> - * @sup_np or it may be an ancestor of @sup_np.
> - */
> - sup_np = of_get_compat_node(sup_np);
> - if (!sup_np) {
> - pr_debug("Not linking %pOFP to %pOFP - No device\n",
> - con_np, tmp_np);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> + /* Check that sup_np and its ancestors are available. */
> + while (tmp_np) {
> + if (of_fwnode_handle(tmp_np)->dev) {
> + of_node_put(tmp_np);
> + break;
> + }
>
> - /*
> - * Don't allow linking a device node as a consumer of one of its
> - * descendant nodes. By definition, a child node can't be a functional
> - * dependency for the parent node.
> - */
> - if (of_is_ancestor_of(con_np, sup_np)) {
> - pr_debug("Not linking %pOFP to %pOFP - is descendant\n",
> - con_np, sup_np);
> - of_node_put(sup_np);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (!of_device_is_available(tmp_np)) {
> + of_node_put(tmp_np);
> + return;
> + }
>
> - /*
> - * Don't create links to "early devices" that won't have struct devices
> - * created for them.
> - */
> - sup_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(&sup_np->fwnode);
> - if (!sup_dev &&
> - (of_node_check_flag(sup_np, OF_POPULATED) ||
> - sup_np->fwnode.flags & FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE)) {
> - pr_debug("Not linking %pOFP to %pOFP - No struct device\n",
> - con_np, sup_np);
> - of_node_put(sup_np);
> - return -ENODEV;
> + tmp_np = of_get_next_parent(tmp_np);
> }
> - put_device(sup_dev);
>
> fwnode_link_add(of_fwnode_handle(con_np), of_fwnode_handle(sup_np));
fwnode_link_add() returns int. Why is the return type of this function
changed to void?
> - of_node_put(sup_np);
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> /**
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists