[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y9gPT709jG/9SpSq@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:41:19 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiaxi Chen <jiaxi.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jing Liu <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: nSVM: explicitly raise KVM_REQ_EVENT on
nested VM exit if L1 doesn't intercept interrupts
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > + * If the L2 doesn't intercept interrupts, then
> > + * (even if the L2 does use virtual interrupt masking),
>
> KVM uses "L2" to refer to the thing running at L2. I think what you are referring
> to here is vmcb12? And that's controlled by L1.
>
> > + * KVM will use the vmcb02's V_INTR to detect interrupt window.
>
> s/the vmcb02/vmcb02
>
> Which of the V_INTR fields does this refer to? Oooh, you're saying the KVM injects
> a virtual interrupt into L2 using vmcb02 in order to determine when L2 has IRQs
> enabled.
>
> Why does KVM do that? Why not pend the actual IRQ directly?
Duh, because KVM needs to gain control in if there are multiple pending events.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists