linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the device-mapper tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bf71a111-21b6-e8b2-9a77-147b74f41b0f@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:26:06 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the device-mapper tree

On 1/30/23 12:53 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29 2023 at  8:56P -0500,
> Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/29/23 6:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The following commits are also in the block tree as different commits
>>> (but the same patches):
>>>
>>>   08a39c820686 ("blk-iocost: avoid 64-bit division in ioc_timer_fn")
>>>   11fd02522aae ("block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq")
>>>   204a9e1eeb4b ("blk-iocost: don't allow to configure bio based device")
>>>   2192a93eb4ac ("ps3vram: remove bio splitting")
>>>   3187f22498f6 ("drbd: remove unnecessary assignment in vli_encode_bits")
>>>   346122e09011 ("block, bfq: retrieve independent access ranges from request queue")
>>>   38d6577f1e01 ("drbd: fix DRBD_VOLUME_MAX 65535 -> 65534")
>>>   3b1c494c4317 ("block: add a new helper bdev_{is_zone_start, offset_from_zone_start}")
>>>   3bf6e7ac9a43 ("drbd: remove macros using require_context")
>>>   419363fec82a ("block: add a BUILD_BUG_ON() for adding more bio flags than we have space")
>>>   4e952a32301a ("blk-iocost: fix divide by 0 error in calc_lcoefs()")
>>>   51ec2387623a ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis")
>>>   55ee20573bd6 ("drbd: make limits unsigned")
>>>   56f5160bc1b8 ("ublk_drv: add mechanism for supporting unprivileged ublk device")
>>>   5d5ce3a05940 ("block: ublk: fix doc build warning")
>>>   612307b9e29b ("block: make BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS unsigned")
>>>   615b51f2a7ec ("block, bfq: forbid stable merging of queues associated with dif
>>> ferent actuators")
>>>   620183fd3cda ("ublk_drv: add device parameter UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DEVT")
>>>   6b5bcbd01de8 ("drbd: split off drbd_config into separate file")
>>>   6e45a73ca9d6 ("drbd: adjust drbd_limits license header")
>>>   6faa01c8bf3b ("ublk_drv: don't probe partitions if the ubq daemon isn't truste
>>> d")
>>>   707107e3c830 ("drbd: drbd_insert_interval(): Clarify comment")
>>>   7a5841d1701d ("block, bfq: balance I/O injection among underutilized actuators
>>> ")
>>>   7a69a19ae640 ("block, bfq: inject I/O to underutilized actuators")
>>>   7b6a2c89052b ("blk-iocost: check return value of match_u64()")
>>>   7b810b50390b ("blk-iocost: read params inside lock in sysfs apis")
>>>   7f0e2433880b ("block: save user max_sectors limit")
>>>   803e2ec47623 ("block: introduce bdev_zone_no helper")
>>>   8564135fe5b0 ("block: don't allow multiple bios for IOCB_NOWAIT issue")
>>>   934f178446b1 ("block: extend bio-cache for non-polled requests")
>>>   93cfbaba481c ("drbd: split off drbd_buildtag into separate file")
>>>   961ccca54ad5 ("ublk_drv: add module parameter of ublks_max for limiting max al
>>> lowed ublk dev")
>>>   988136a30715 ("nvme: set REQ_ALLOC_CACHE for uring-passthru request")
>>>   9d1d75e23110 ("drbd: drop API_VERSION define")
>>>   a2aea8f56f9e ("s390/dcssblk:: don't call bio_split_to_limits")
>>>   a5d140c503b6 ("ublk_drv: move ublk_get_device_from_id into ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd
>>> ")
>>>   aa70bcb25683 ("drbd: interval tree: make removing an "empty" interval a no-op"
>>> )
>>>   abc42d89596a ("MAINTAINERS: add drbd headers")
>>>   ad5572498be1 ("blk-iocost: change div64_u64 to DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP in ioc_refre
>>> sh_params()")
>>>   ba0b61d03ce3 ("block: treat poll queue enter similarly to timeouts")
>>>   d5ff0182856b ("block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated st
>>> ruct")
>>>   d66a012deb65 ("ublk_drv: remove nr_aborted_queues from ublk_device")
>>>   ef0e0afd782e ("block: remove superfluous check for request queue in bdev_is_zo
>>> ned()")
>>>   fd44c9c683bc ("block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis
>>> ")
>>>
>>> It looks like the block tree was rebased ...
>>
>> It was, to avoid a conflict and second patch issue. Mike, let me know if
>> rebasing the dm tree is a concern, then we roll back and deal with the
>> pain instead...
> 
> No problem, I rebased DM.

Great, thanks Mike.

-- 
Jens Axboe